Reluctantly Saved
#1
Posted 15 June 2012 - 11:02 PM
Now, if I saw her being attacked by zombies and was about to die, I wouldn't be able to just sit back and watch her die. No matter how much resentment I have towards her, I couldn't just let her die. A couple other people fall under this category in my life as well.
So, who would you reluctantly save?
#2
Posted 15 June 2012 - 11:10 PM
I feel like I'd try to save any kid or dog. I wouldn't live with myself if I let one of those two die.
Then again, I would like to think that no matter how horrid someone treated me, I would at least give them the consideration of being saved. Any familiar face would make me want to help, but...
"I would if I could, but I can't so I won't."
#3
Posted 15 June 2012 - 11:36 PM
#4
Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:17 AM
#5
Posted 16 June 2012 - 07:54 AM
As far as saving people in general... my top priority would be my boyfriend and my family. Period. I will risk life and limb for them, no matter what happens to me.
I would try my best to save innocent people I saw on the verge of being attacked... but not to the point that it puts my loved ones or myself in danger, as I need to keep myself alive to make sure my boyfriend and family are protected.
I'm extremely protective of my loved ones... I don't think it would be wise to trust a stranger to join our group in that situation, as a zombie apocalypse is enough to make the sanest person crazy.
Mind you i'm the type of person who helps random people in my general every day life... it's just in my nature... but what's also in my nature is the instinct and automatic priority to always protect and put my loved ones first, always. So in the event of a zombie apocalypse... that is exactly what I would do.
#6
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:03 PM
Like others said, I would die for my family. Most definetly. Even though I am pretty scared of death...
As for others, like strangers and all, I think I would definetly try to help them but if the situation unfortunately got risky and dangerous I would leave. I'd feel terrible and very bad but I think thats what would happen.
#7
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:17 PM
Ryan_Dead, on 16 June 2012 - 01:03 PM, said:
Like others said, I would die for my family. Most definetly. Even though I am pretty scared of death...
As for others, like strangers and all, I think I would definetly try to help them but if the situation unfortunately got risky and dangerous I would leave. I'd feel terrible and very bad but I think thats what would happen.
I may be hard-pressed to save family. In typical American fashion, we are pretty spread out. My daughter is leaving for college at the end of the summer about 18 hours away (by car). My parents live about 3 hours away. My son lives in the same city as us. We might be able to save him, or more likely, he'll save us.
#8
Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:49 PM
But I think in a life-threatening situation, we might think different--I don't know. You'd have to measure your own survival vs. others' needs. It might something innate in each of us--either to save ourselves or both. Maybe I'm thinking about the scene with Shane and Otis?
#9
Posted 16 June 2012 - 05:08 PM
The best decision is the one that keeps us alive! -Shane Walsh
#10
Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:47 PM
backwoodsroamer, on 15 June 2012 - 11:36 PM, said:
Not a dumb ass unless Im a dumb ass which I am not because I feel the exact same way as you about most of the human race. Good riddance I say. And I do not have a hate list -I just dislike most people. Its nothing personal but as a race we are a total fail.
Id be in the pet store saving all the critters.


"One cries because one is sad. For example, I cry because others are stupid, and that makes me sad' ~Sheldon
Dellamorte Dellamore ... 'Of Death of Love'
#11
Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:45 PM
Living Dead Grrrl, on 16 June 2012 - 08:47 PM, said:
Id be in the pet store saving all the critters.
Well of course, it goes without saying. Critters get saved first!
#12
Posted 17 June 2012 - 01:03 AM
#13
Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:29 AM
Save other people ? I guess i will be with my brother and hes gf (maybe some of hes friend) i suppose some will die me included , at that point i will nottry to save nobody and will make sure everyone with me doesnt try to be a hero , after few weeks or months and the "new world" is in state depending on situations i can see myself scouting for new people but only persons i think will fit
#14
Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:31 AM
leon the pig farmer, on 17 June 2012 - 01:03 AM, said:
Larger group also means big target my friend , unless you made your very own woodbury or alexandria
#15
Posted 17 June 2012 - 10:02 AM
Melquiades Estrada, on 17 June 2012 - 04:29 AM, said:
Save other people ? I guess i will be with my brother and hes gf (maybe some of hes friend) i suppose some will die me included , at that point i will nottry to save nobody and will make sure everyone with me doesnt try to be a hero , after few weeks or months and the "new world" is in state depending on situations i can see myself scouting for new people but only persons i think will fit
Nice
I don't think I'd leave the house at all, so I'd have no chance to save anyone. I'd be the one having to be reluctantly saved, or maybe my husband would pragmatically kill me too for this very reason.
#16
Posted 17 June 2012 - 01:02 PM
100 heavily armed and well fed living could happily wipe out 1000 walkers.
Just have to find the right area, dig huge trenches, barbed wire, walls etc.
Remember that places such as Home Depot, Fry's electronics, Bass Pro stores will be wide open to salvaging equipment.
You could take over a small town, wall it off, then start from scratch.
Within a few years you could have power back up, generators, a small wind farm. vegetable patches etc.
BUT, truth would be another thing. 100 people could have no skills, I dont know much about electricity and building.
What if 100 dumb asses just got together and held up in a town, and then starved to death in a zombie siege.
Thinking about it now, i'd rather just hold up by myself and try and survive.
Melquiades Estrada, on 17 June 2012 - 04:31 AM, said:
#17
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:38 PM
Melquiades Estrada, on 17 June 2012 - 04:29 AM, said:
You sir... are hardcore.
On the topic of big groups, I don't think going into a ZA with the mindset that your going to stay alone is very smart. People mean you have someone to watch your back, even though they cause problems as well. I believe the pros outweigh the cons. That's not to say I want a group of 40 people following me around. I would stick to 15 max... and even that's pushing it.
Edited by Gingerbeard, 17 June 2012 - 05:40 PM.
#18
Posted 17 June 2012 - 08:46 PM
#19
Posted 17 June 2012 - 09:42 PM
People change under extreme stress, some for the better, some for the worse. The guy whom might be the neighbourhood tough guy could easily turn into a gibbering wreck of no use whatsoever when faced with the harsh reality that his family have just been killed and eaten. Paradoxically (my word of the day) an 8 stone weakling may show all the attributes of a cold , hard , pragmatic killer. We just don't know.
I was always tought when someone is dead, leave them, there's nothing you can do. concentrate on the living, help them. Always reach down to people, never reach up, and if you ever have to reach up, make sure you're reaching to the one person you know will hold on regardless.
During any serious End days scenario or even in times of extreme hardship, there will be alot of people reaching up, help your loved ones first, once they're safe, assess if you can help anyone else. If they're worth helping then do so, if not, then all you need to remember is that you'll feel worse if a loved one dies as a result of your actions.
Sometimes your good intentions can get you hurt or worse. Keep your group small, managable and realistic. My group will consist of Me, Mrs T, Jr and baby Tex, but as Mrs Tex seems to enjoy her time away it may well just be me and Jr (in which case I'll turn myself over to the zombies).
#20
Posted 18 June 2012 - 12:06 AM
Although if the ZA ever happend I would hope that I wouldn't get myself into a situation where I needed to be rescued, and I also wouldn't expect people to risk their own lives for me. Especially if it was my own fault. But hopefully, if that situation ever happened I would be badass so I would never need rescuing.
#21
Posted 26 June 2012 - 08:51 PM
I am not stopping for anyone or anything. I don't care if I pass a busload of orphans being attacked, I am not stopping. My first and last priority is getting to my family and I will go through Hell to get to them if needed.
I know this is cold and I am a bastard if I leave a person to die but a situation like this calls for hard decisions.
#22
Posted 22 October 2012 - 05:26 AM
#23
Posted 22 October 2012 - 06:25 AM
#24
Posted 22 October 2012 - 07:58 PM
#25
Posted 21 November 2012 - 10:03 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





Sign In
Create Account
Back to top











