Was Carl going to shoot Rick?
#51
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:24 PM
#52
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:30 PM
Just my thought.
#53
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:37 PM
Now i don't know if Carl was pointing his gun at rick but it certainly seemed that way from ricks POV (obviously because rick is oblivious to shanes reanimation). Also i don't know if this has been said but after Carl shot Shane he smirked and was openly proud of himself so my question is this. Was Carl ready to shoot anybody just to prove his worth to the rest of the group and himself?
#54
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:42 PM
#55
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:44 PM
#56
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
Executive producer, and showrunner, Glen Mazzara clears this debate up:
Quote
Mazzara: That's Rick's perception, but I think that Carl is clearly shooting to protect his father. Rick doesn't know that zombie Shane is over his shoulder, so I do think that Rick has questions of guilt. And Carl is really just a confused little boy at that point.
More: http://www.tvguide.c...ra-1044673.aspx
Edited by Faith, 16 March 2012 - 11:52 AM.
#57
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:27 PM
Carl draws his gun an the very next shot is Shane standing fully upright....clearly Carl saw Shane start twitching am struggling to his feet (zombies cant go from laying down to instantly on their feet, they have to roll over, get to their knees then stand up right)
i though it was pretty obvious with the camera angle that they wanted us to think he was pointing it at Rick but he clearly had to of saw zombie shane trying to stand up!
and not to mention Carl didnt know Rick killed him so why would he point the gun at his dad for no reason? Carl does NOT know that everyone reanimates no matter what, so seeing Shane reanimate, carl obviously thought shane got bit!
in the preview for the finally,
Edited by gracie lou, 16 March 2012 - 01:01 PM.
tags
#58
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:41 PM
Ciren, on 12 March 2012 - 11:01 PM, said:
So it's not absurd, and in no way deserving of a "lmao" or
ok Carl drew his gun an the very next shot was shane standing FULLY UPRIGHT (literally 2 second time span) so you mean to tell me that a zombie can go from laying down to standing upright instantly? No! Clearly a zombie is gonna struggle to get to his feet... watch again and look at how quick it is from the time carl draws to shane standing upright!
there is no reason why carl would point his gun at his dad! If Carl saw Rick kill Shane, then carl woulf know shane was gonna kill him first!
Edited by gracie lou, 16 March 2012 - 01:02 PM.
tags
#59
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:45 PM
Jimmy, on 12 March 2012 - 11:42 PM, said:
A little off topic, but did anyone else find it hilarious the way Zombie Shane was walking?
So carl never fired a gun before? Yes he did....he was training with the group and nailed a tin can from quite a distance...he definitley HAS shot before...
And how is it so odd carl can do a perfect headshot when everyone in the group gets a perfect headshot every shot they take!? Unrealistic i know but i mean if everyone on the show has perfect aim, why cant carl too?
#60
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:49 PM
Ciren, on 12 March 2012 - 11:01 PM, said:
So it's not absurd, and in no way deserving of a "lmao" or
Not trying to argue but maybe you should READ before u reply....on the first page, Mr Teaspoon said "he DEFINITLEY was pointing at Rick".....so thats why i said "how are you guys sure? Lmao"
So how can u say "nobody said for sure"...when clearly ppl did...
#61
Posted 16 March 2012 - 01:47 PM
#62
Posted 16 March 2012 - 03:34 PM
if Carl saw the situation, he'd know shane wanted to kill his dad. If he didnt see it, dont you think Carl would more than likely assume shane got bit and not that rick killed his best friend? I know i do!
other than Shane laying there dead, there is nothing that would indicate Rick killed him or give Carl a reason to "assume" rick killed shane..
#63
Posted 16 March 2012 - 03:40 PM
I mean think about Carls POV. This is what he knows:
my dad an his best friend went into the woods to look for an escaped prisoner that has a gun, heres my dad standin over his dead best friend crying his eyes out an then shane reanimates...
What happened that would make Carl assume Rick killed shane? (Assuming Carl didnt see the fight)
#64
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:48 AM
mr teaspoon, on 12 March 2012 - 07:36 AM, said:
Really?? I totally bought that he was pointing it at his Dad initially. He just saw him stab Shane in the chest and instinctively lines up his dad thinking that his dad had just done something horribly wrong, but then Shane reanimates, gets up and starts walking towards them and he shoots Shane dead to same them both.
I didnt see anything wrong with it IMHO.
#65
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:50 PM
JaeBoogie, on 16 March 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:
#66
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:09 PM
I get what they were going for now. Carl comes upon Rick crying over Shane's dead body, draws his gun out of instinct thinking Shane had to be bit(and possibly Rick too at that point), as his father walks toward him talking(comfirming he's not a walker) Carl has his gun aimed at the now reanimating Shane, believing that Carl witnessed the whole thing Rick tries to comfort him thinking Carl has the gun on Rick, but really Carl has walker Shane lined up with a perfect "over the other guy's shoulder" head shot. Come on now.
Why not just make Carl able to bend the bullet like in "Wanted"??!? And I'm really not that much of a nitpicker with the show, but that scene could have been done so much better.
Edited by babyMOMMAdrama, 27 March 2012 - 02:13 PM.
#67
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:59 PM
auximenes, on 27 March 2012 - 01:50 PM, said:
Yeah, I think we were supposed to wonder if Carl possibly saw the altercation. I thought it was pretty unnecessary - the scene was dramatic enough, and it just confused people.
#68
Posted 28 March 2012 - 04:52 AM
Now i know the scene was all for the views to shock viewers into jumping out of their seat and saying, "heck no was Carl really that close to shane to shoot his own father for killing shane?". Anyways i really did wanted to slap Carl right then. Yea pretty unrealistic acting but whatever adds tension i guess
#69
Posted 28 March 2012 - 10:35 PM
#70
Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:28 AM
Let's just hope four is your lucky number.
#71
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:50 PM
#72
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:43 PM
#73
Posted 06 April 2012 - 12:35 AM
As for the "choppy" feel to the scene...I think that the reason for that is the fact that according to the cast and crew, they spent almost all night doing take-after-take of that scene. It is probably pieced together from any number of takes. Some of those shots probably 'agreed' with each other better than others...but producers/editors are always looking to balance the technical aspects with the dramatic/acting aspects of the shots. Some shots have the inflections in voice, others have the facial responses while others have the actors hitting all the right marks in frame at the right moments. Only Mazzara can say just how many takes were spliced together to make that scene in the show.
In the end...like beauty, it lies in the eye of the beholder. Thus, four pages worth of debate over whether one thing was happening/going to happen or not.
#74
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:26 PM
#75
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:34 PM
The choppiness of the scene isn't about the amount of takes it took to do the scene. It's about making the scene move fast, creating tension, and making the viewer see and experience things as the director and film editor want him to. I didn't think it was sloppy at all. I think it created the right affects in viewer experience for the scene.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





Sign In
Create Account
Back to top










