What Type Of Survivor Would You Be?
#1
Posted 22 February 2012 - 10:15 PM
A man always has two reasons for doing anything: a good reason and the real reason.
- J. P. Morgan
#2
Posted 22 February 2012 - 10:19 PM
If it was me, I'd say more of a Daryl. Mainly because growing up in a town like mine has given me street smarts
WE'RE UP ALL NIGHT TO GET LUCKY
#3
Posted 22 February 2012 - 10:44 PM
#4
Posted 22 February 2012 - 10:44 PM
I'd want to be part of a group. Hopefully one with good survival skills. I'm a little on the old and fat side to be playing Rambo but I can shoot well enough to pull my weight. Besides, I think brains more than brawn would be more important for long terms survival.
#5
Posted 22 February 2012 - 11:03 PM
I think I would be similar to Gleen. The only addition will be Rick's strong feelings about injustice. I just hate that shit. We are not completly alike, but I'm sure I see a lot of Gleen in me.
I resemble both Gleen and Rick really. I can't decide.
Edited by Survivor, 22 February 2012 - 11:04 PM.
#6
Posted 23 February 2012 - 01:11 AM
If done right a group survival effort always has a better chance for success. Done right means good leadership, organization, group effort, and so on. Leadership because humans are herd animals and most people are followers not leaders. Been there seen that. Organization means finding everyone's skills and utilizing them properly. One person's weakness can be compensated for by another's strength, and vice versa. Group effort means everyone contributes all they can. Everyone's contribution will not be equal. Different people will bring different skills to the group. It's the leader's job to best utilize varied skills found in his unit. Older people, children, and the injured are variables that have to be worked into the equation.
If done wrong a group effort turns into total chaos. Chaos leads to failure. Been there seen that to. In this scenario failure means death.
Going it alone is viable in a short term scenario, but your long term outlook is not good. Odds have a way of catching up with you. A sprained ankle, a bad fall, an illness, or an encounter with a group of the enemy to large for you to handle alone are just a few of the scenarios that can prove fatal. Then you wind up playing on the other team. You know, the hungry, slow moving, decaying team.
So, to answer your question, I'll try for a group. I also reserve the option to bug out if it turns out to be a total cluster f##k.
#7
Posted 23 February 2012 - 01:42 AM
#8
Posted 23 February 2012 - 03:45 AM
#9
Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:46 AM
#10
Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:51 AM
#12
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:19 PM
No, really I'd be content to get the hell out of dodge with my immediate family/friends and maintain a small group of people I know in the least populated area I can find. If I lost everyone I knew, I'd set up camp as a loner and evaluate individuals/groups carefully as I came across them.
#13
Posted 23 February 2012 - 06:33 PM
backwoodsroamer, on 23 February 2012 - 01:11 AM, said:
If done right a group survival effort always has a better chance for success. Done right means good leadership, organization, group effort, and so on. Leadership because humans are herd animals and most people are followers not leaders. Been there seen that. Organization means finding everyone's skills and utilizing them properly. One person's weakness can be compensated for by another's strength, and vice versa. Group effort means everyone contributes all they can. Everyone's contribution will not be equal. Different people will bring different skills to the group. It's the leader's job to best utilize varied skills found in his unit. Older people, children, and the injured are variables that have to be worked into the equation.
If done wrong a group effort turns into total chaos. Chaos leads to failure. Been there seen that to. In this scenario failure means death.
Going it alone is viable in a short term scenario, but your long term outlook is not good. Odds have a way of catching up with you. A sprained ankle, a bad fall, an illness, or an encounter with a group of the enemy to large for you to handle alone are just a few of the scenarios that can prove fatal. Then you wind up playing on the other team. You know, the hungry, slow moving, decaying team.
So, to answer your question, I'll try for a group. I also reserve the option to bug out if it turns out to be a total cluster f##k.
#14
Posted 23 February 2012 - 11:03 PM
boutte, on 23 February 2012 - 06:33 PM, said:
Also the first time we had to run for it the others could get away while the zombies stopped to eat my crippled, old a##. Dang, I really feel for Otis.
#15
Posted 24 February 2012 - 01:00 AM
Ever.
#16
Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:42 AM
#17
Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:21 AM
#18
Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:56 AM
daenerys, on 24 February 2012 - 04:21 AM, said:
I tip my hat to the marksperson from down under. You take care of business with your bad self.
#19
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:01 AM
Jack Sylvane, on 24 February 2012 - 02:42 AM, said:
I gotta tell you Jack, I'd feel a whole lot better about your chances if you hadn't told me you were gonna defend yourself with a dead snake from the Amazon. That's Colt not Cold.
#20
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:01 AM
backwoodsroamer, on 24 February 2012 - 04:56 AM, said:
Lol. Uh.. thanks. I really would prefer to be with others though if possible. A life of solitude would wear me down - and who the heck wants to keep watch all day AND all night?
#21
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:03 AM
Scream, on 24 February 2012 - 01:00 AM, said:
Ever.
Oh, I feel your pain. My (near) seven year old lad is much the same. Still, if he fails to tidy his bedroom this weekend, I'd happily offer him up as bait...
Did I say that aloud?!
Don't Dead Open Inside...
#22
Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:15 AM
Barry Cade, on 24 February 2012 - 09:03 AM, said:
Did I say that aloud?!
Not to worry these little confusions as to what or what not was said frequently arise. Just this evening my lovely wife was telling me about her day. I asked "Would you please hand me the sugar." Somehow she heard "Can you please shut your yapping mouth for just one minute." Of course I assured her my unending love would never allow me think such a thing much less say it aloud.
#23
Posted 25 February 2012 - 09:14 AM
backwoodsroamer, on 25 February 2012 - 06:15 AM, said:
Women, hey?! Can't live with 'em... [insert jocular yet slightly risqué comment here]
Don't Dead Open Inside...
#24
Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:22 AM
#25
Posted 25 February 2012 - 12:36 PM
If I were in a survival group I'd be very useful but at the first sign of serious group conflict. I'd be gone before sun up and you'd never find me.
I'd evade and hide. Stalk and ambush. I would really go out of my way to avoid conflict. It's nice to think that you'd be a death machine or you could handle a group of people attacking you unless you've done something like this before. You would get hurt, you could get handicapped, PTSD etc. It'd be a hard way to live day to day. I sleep outside a lot (no not homeless) and paddle miles off shore by myself. I do it alone because no is crazy enough to come along. Your best bet would be to find a community of caring, useful people who have survival in mind and take care of them. Much like the how the show's group is portrayed.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





Sign In
Create Account
Back to top










