"It's your opinion and that's fine"JesusMonroe you complain about every episode, I think I've seen maybe 1 positive post from you ever. It's your opinion and that's fine but I just don't see the point of you watching the show or even watching the show and then coming on here to complain about it. Even when the shows at it's best, you still complain. Just watch the episodes and enjoy them and stop being so negative. Walking Dead is the most popular show on tv, definitely one of the best (probably the best) and just in general, it's a damn good show so enjoy it.
I do apologize if I sound a bit harsh but I just think you need to enjoy the show for once.
That's basically the crux of it. On the flip side of the coin, I don't think I've seen one negative post from you ever. I’ve actually seen posts where you claim that people who don’t like a certain episode are people who don’t like character development. I'd rather be critical of the show and acknowledge its flaws than constantly praise it. I’ve criticized Breaking Bad. I’ve criticized Game of Thrones. I’ve criticized the Walking Dead comic (just as much as the show in fact).
In fact, saying you’ve only seen one positive post from me ever? Really? That must be pretty selective. Positive is “not negative.” If you go by that logic, I’ve reviewed four of the episodes this season in a positive manner. One of the four negative episodes was also one that I praised but said it had too much filler. Don’t view my grading scale as a school system. A B is very good. I gave Too Far Gone the range from a B to A- because I couldn’t really decide. Any episodes I give less than an A- to and make a post about it, I get downvoted. Just because I give an episode a less than perfect score doesn’t mean it’s bad. Especially if I’m rating a show against itself.
Another thing: Saying you don’t see the point of me watching the show if all I do is complain (which I don’t) adds nothing to these conversations. Just a personal pet peeve of mine that I want to address. There’s a reason that that phrase was banned from one thread. It doesn’t add to any constructive discussion
Also, popularity means barely anything when it comes to the quality of a show. We don’t exactly see Transformers win at the Oscars every year. Shawshank Redemption and Fight Club were both box office flops (If you want a good review pointing out the flaws of the Walking Dead, go to this thread http://www.roamersan...e-walking-dead/)
At the beginning of every review I make, I say, “If you downvote me, can you explain why you disagree?” So, Joseph, explain why you disagree. Instead of saying I’m being too negative and should just enjoy the show for what it is and saying that I never make any positive posts, how about you counter me? This forum is made for discussion after all. You think Too Far Gone is the best episode ever? That’s fine. Of the points that I made about the episode, explain why you disagree. I’d happily get into a debate with you about one of your disagreements with my opinion, but you never explain why you disagree with me, or explain why you like an episode, so there’s nothing for me to say. I’m being too negative on Too Far Gone? Explain
I gave Too Far Gone a positive grade and positive review. I also put criticisms in that review. I can either copy and paste that review every time Too Far Gone is mentioned, or I can simply summarize my thoughts in a post. The first 80% being retarded is my summary for that. That’s far from, “This sucked balls.” Should I have said, “I don’t like the first 80% that much?” It’s just too nitpicky for something simple.The reason these comments get downvotes is because of the tone in which they are stated.
For example, there's a fine line between saying "This episode sucked balls" and "I didn't like this episode very much".
The second post wouldn't get many downvotes, if at all. The first one would, because it sounds like the poster is stating his/her opinion as fact,
and not doing it in a really nice way either. And if I may be frank, the post with the highest amount of downvotes in this thread is a perfect example of what I'm trying to say.
And saying that the second post wouldn’t get much downvotes, if at all, is not true. I’ve gotten downvotes when I’ve explained my points, I’ve gotten downvotes when I’ve given positive reviews (my only complaint about Internment was that the use of firearms was unrealistic) and I’ve seen others get downvotes for ridiculous reasons. I’ve seen people get many downvotes for saying an episode was okay, I’ve seen someone get multiple downvotes for confusing Lauren Cohan’s accent, etc. I hardly see how my post was a perfect example because I wasn’t stating my post as a fact
But thank you for explaining why you disagree with me